Jose Mejia
Ms. Reyes
English 1302-65R
2-20-2017
Whether it’s with a “tweet”,
the notorious “hashtag” or even a spontaneous picture upload, Twitter has found
many ways to let people all over the world express their stories. Thousands,
and even millions of posts are posted and passed along through twitter implementing
opinions of all kind. All posts mainly are made or composed of national or even
global situations that are happening. One’s opinion can be another’s total
opposing reason on what they believe is right or wrong on certain dilemmas.
Once the app begins to gain an immense amount of tweets regarding certain
subjects, a trend is officially instituted within the app itself. Celebrities,
athletes, politicians and iconic figures have the greatest influences on the
app being able to connect their posts, to the public audience. This matter is
an extremely important rhetorical connection because of the words in which the
iconic figures use in their posts.
In Ramage, Bean, and
Johnson’s, “Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric
with Readings,” the authors mention something known as the ‘Rhetorical
Triangle’ in page 55 of the book. This template or structure characterized key points
such as the audience, message and the writer or speaker. To get into further
knowledge of what the authors meant by this, they mentioned the persuasive appeals
of Pathos, Logos and Ethos. Each appeal is related, but generally distinctive as
well. I’ve chosen Ethos to represent the actual representation of the post made
by a notorious celebrity. Chris Evans, better known as, “Captain America” is a
constant user of Twitter. His posts throughout the last year have received all
sorts of feedback and even backlash by the media and public users of the
self-platform.
Mr. Evans mentions in
this post I chose to portray my information saying, “Obviously we must
prioritize keeping Americans safe. But we mustn’t become un-American in the
process.” Evans was a huge follower of Hilary Clinton in this past Presidential
race which in terms, made him greatly dislike the opposing candidate, Donald
Trump. This post was uploaded after Mr. Trump was inaugurated as the 45th
President of the United States. Therefore, Evens is responding in his own
rhetorical opinion on one of these suppose actions that will be applied by the
President, in his first 100 days in office. Ethos is greatly being portrayed in
this post made by Evans, due to his major political overview in past remarks.
In the book, “Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings,” the author mentions
in page 55, “ethos is also a function of the writer’s reputation for honesty
and expertise independent by the message.” This post mentioned backs up on how it is that
Evans appealed with his persuasive opinion.
The audience, in
respective to this matter, is intended to every single American. Regardless if
they are or aren’t a follower of Donald Trump and his actions, Evans is trying
to create a powerful opinion in saying that the protection of every single
American is a priority. However, the actions Mr. Trump is doing mainly
involving immigration, has become the un-American way of fixing the country. I
mention this because it’s strictly what Chris Evans is trying to wrap around to
the U.S. public. Trump is trying to send as many illegal immigrants back to
their respective countries in order to make a “better” and “safe” America.
Evans mentions, “We mustn’t become un-American in the process,” by saying this
he expresses how doing this sort of injustice isn’t the true American way in
solving civil problems. Logos is greatly being used in this concept.
This post although
repeating some words and being short, stated more than one can actually
realize. Evans made his statement clear and sparked a great argument on such a
self-narrative platform. To enhance more into perspective, the rhetorical
analysis from this comment goes to show a very profound way of getting a solemn
opinion across on such a delicate issue. This specific piece compared to other
arguments isn’t as complex as others, but Evans saw that you don’t have to be
complex to get such a self-persuasive “American” rhetoric opinion across.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Pearson, 2016. Print.

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think the strongest part of your writing was your introduction, you gave a brief summary of your platform and the affordances this platform has. Also the post you analyzed was very well analyzed and well thought into it. All the information you have is great and the brief political background about your famous person, that he was “huge follower of Hillary Clinton” was very clever, because we understood why Chris Evans would tweet something like that. I believe you should work on the flow of your ideas, trying to connect them better by not just simply answering in short statements what we are being told to find about your post. Again you have all the information there, just try to connect them by using transitional words or phrases, I think you should review the activity we did in class of the Anderson quotes maybe it can help you explain in detail your post and also is can be a great plus for your paper if you include one of his quotes.. Overall I believe you analyzed your post perfectly and the affordances of your platform in your first paragraph, but just try to work on the connection between all of your great ideas to create a smooth flow on your paper.
ReplyDeleteHi Jose,
ReplyDeleteI think your post lost focus on the rhetoric of Evans, as you segued more and more into Trump's rhetoric.
I highly suggest looking at the outline from our textbook for a rhetorical analysis on pp. 168; next check out Aylin's post from class, her analysis is well organized, focused and well developed.
I also encourage you to reconsider if the appeal Evans is making is really based on ethos. What credibility does he have? Is it that he played Steve Rogers? Wouldn't Steve Rogers be more credible? So is this a fallacy?