Sunday, February 12, 2017
Reflection #2
I did not receive further feedback from my partner, but with what I was provided by my partner and Ms. Reyes before my second draft post helped me improve my valid argument. I included key points in backing up the history and transcendence of Twitter, but lacked the final argument as to the actual cultural overview of how Twitter influences self-writing. I used more of what my partner mentioned in using a piece from Anderson (Pg. 213) to expand my statement on how the lack of characters is a negative, but as well as a positive in enabling anyone to narrate their daily stories. After writing my second draft, this research showed me abroad at how small details of Twitter can lead to huge innovations within the app. The limit of characters (140) is a key contributor as to how Twitter is so complex within its self-writing contribution to the world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment